The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and use Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is actually important for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to prevent potential offenders and be certain justice to the victims and their people.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may possibly seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
Reasonable grounds can be obtained to the record to attach the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. Though punishment from the alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit with the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of your petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even within the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
The issue here is that an accused may well say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they did not plan to eliminate them. In other words, they could claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been in the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally seem, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion can be thought of, however, we are crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy issue for the approval on the competent authority.
Using keywords effectively can be vital. Think about using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the most significant tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to carry out, i.e. secure its citizens.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property could also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and identified experts to review and rule on foreseeable future grid station projects. In read more addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.